Skip to main content

Validation of age- and sex-dependent association of uric acid and incident hypertension in rural areas

Abstract

Background

A previous study based on urban areas suggested the age- and sex-dependent association of uric acid (UA) and incident hypertension. We aimed to investigate whether this association is valid even in rural areas with different lifestyle.

Methods

Data from the cardiovascular disease association study, a prospective cohort study based on rural residents, was analyzed. A total of 4,592 subjects (mean age, 60.1 ± 9.5 years; men, 37.7%) without hypertension were included. We first investigated whether UA was a risk factor for incident hypertension using Cox regression, and then compared the relative risk by stratification according to age and sex.

Results

During the follow-up period (mean, 2.0 years), 579 subjects (12.6%) were newly diagnosed with hypertension. The risk factors for incident hypertension were age (Hazard ratios [HR] for ≥ 65, 1.26), systolic blood pressure (HR per 1 mmHg increase, 1.07), and serum UA concentration (HR per 1 mmHg increase, 1.10). The risk of UA-related incident hypertension was higher in the non-elderly than in the elderly for both men and women (HR, 1.74 for non-elderly men; 1.88 for non-elderly women; 1.66 for elderly men; 1.10 for elderly women). Even after adjusting for multiple confounders, the risk of UA-related incident hypertension was significantly higher in non-elderly women (HR, 1.59; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Age- and sex-dependent association of UA with incident hypertension suggested in cohort study based on urban areas was consistently found in rural areas as well. In particular, non-elderly women were at a higher risk for UA-related incident hypertension.

Background

The link between uric acid (UA) and hypertension has long been of interest. Since it was first suggested more than a century ago that UA may play a role in the pathogenesis of hypertension [1], many studies on the association between hypertension and UA have been conducted. Nevertheless, the results on the association between hypertension and UA in many previous studies were not clearly consistent because there were many differences in age, sex, and various variables related to lifestyle that affect UA in each study.

Recent meta-analyses had reported that hyperuricemia and elevated UA are associated with the risk of hypertension [2, 3]. The authors suggested that this association may be relatively greater in younger age and in women. However, significant differences in age and sex composition among the study populations included in these analyses remained limited in concluding the role of age and sex in the risk of UA-associated hypertension. Recently, we reported an age- and sex- dependent association of UA and incident hypertension in a community-based prospective cohort study [4]. However, UA is affected by lifestyle [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], and in that study, there was a limitation that these confounders were not sufficiently corrected. Since it is impossible to completely adjust the lifestyle in a prospective study, we aimed to determine whether the results of our previous study based on urban areas are also valid in this study based on rural areas.

Methods

Study population and design

We analyzed data from the cardiovascular disease association study (CAVAS) cohort, which is part of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) cohort. KoGES is a large-scale, prospective cohort study initiated by the Korean government, establishing an epidemiological study platform with a health database, and investigating the environmental etiology and prognosis of chronic diseases in Koreans through long-term follow-up. The CAVAS study, one of the six prospective cohort studies constituting KoGES, is a rural community-based study targeting residents living in rural areas that are different from in urban areas. It recruited the subjects aged 40–70 years from rural areas since 2004. All participants were interviewed for the sociodemographic information and medical history. Laboratory tests were performed by trained medical staff. Blood pressure was measured twice using a mercury sphygmomanometer and recorded as the average of the two values. The first measurement was taken after 5 min of rest, and the second measurement was taken at least 1 min apart. If the difference between the two measurements exceeded 5 mmHg, blood pressure measurements were continued until two consecutive measurements were comparable. Details of the KoGES and CAVAS study have been described previously [12].

Of the 28,338 subjects who participated in CAVAS, 7,673 subjects with UA measured participated in the first follow-up were included in this study. Finally, 4,592 subjects were analyzed, excluding those who had hypertension at baseline (n = 3,074) or those who did not have data on blood pressure (n = 7) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study population. CAVAS, cardiovascular disease association study; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BP, blood pressure

Hypertension (taking anti-hypertensives or having systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg), hyperuricemia (serum UA level > 7 mg/dL in men and > 6 mg/dL in women) [13, 14], smoking (smoked > 5 packs in his/her lifetime) [15, 16], and drinking (> 12 drinks in the past year) [17] were defined as in previous urban-based cohort study [4]. Incident hypertension was defined as the occurrence of hypertension during the follow-up period.

Statistical analysis

We divided the entire study population into three groups according to the level of UA. Accordingly, tertile 1, 2, and 3 were defined as < 5.0 mg/dL, 5.0–6.0 mg/dL, and ≥ 6.0 mg/dL for men, and as < 3.8 mg/dL, 3.8–4.6 mg/dL, and ≥ 4.6 mg/dL for women, respectively. The risk of incident hypertension was analyzed using Cox regression for all subjects to determine whether UA is a risk factor for incident hypertension. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for age, sex, baseline systolic and diastolic BP, diabetes, dyslipidemia, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, drinking/smoking status, and UA. To determine age- and sex-dependent association of UA and incident hypertension, the study population was stratified according to sex, age group, and UA level. All analyses were conducted using SAS ver. 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

Among the 4,592 subjects included in the analysis, 1,733 (37.7%) were male. The mean age was 60.1 ± 9.5 years, and mean follow-up duration was 2.0 years. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean concentration of UA was 4.8 ± 1.3 mg/dL, and 418 subjects (9.1%) had hyperuricemia. Subjects in tertile 3 tended to have higher BP, body mass index, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, but lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. They tended to be more drinkers.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics according to serum uric acid level

UA as a risk factor of hypertension

During the follow-up period, hypertension occurred in 579 of 4,592 subjects. The risk factors for incident hypertension were age, systolic BP, and serum UA concentration (Table 2). The risk of incident hypertension was 1.26 times higher in the elderly group over 65 years compared to the non-elderly group under 65 years old. The risk increased 1.07-fold for each 1 mmHg increase in systolic BP and 1.10-fold for each 1 mg/dL increase in UA.

Table 2 Risk factors for incident hypertension

Serum UA level and the risk of incident hypertension according to sex and age

Across the study populations, the risk of incident hypertension was highest in tertile 3, the group with the highest level of UA, for both men and women (HR, 1.74 for non-elderly men; 1.88 for non-elderly women; 1.66 for elderly men; 1.10 for elderly women) (Table 3). This was more pronounced in non-elderly women. After adjusting for multiple confounders, the risk of incident hypertension was significantly higher only in non-elderly women (HR, 1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–2.50).

Table 3 Relative risk of hypertension according to uric acid level by sex and age

Discussion

The results of our study based on rural areas can be summarized as follows. In rural areas, an increase in UA was associated with incident hypertension. The risk of UA-related incident hypertension was significantly higher in non-elderly women. These results of this study were consistent with those of previous urban-based cohort study [4].

In previous meta-analyses, it has been reported that UA is associated with the risk of incident hypertension, regardless of traditional risk factors [2, 3]. However, in these analyses, the authors acknowledged that the statistical power to explain this relationship was weak in the elderly and that the statistical method, degree of adjustment, and residual confounding factors, which differed from study to study, were the limitations of the studies.

The weak statistical association in the elderly could be explained by a previous large cohort study based on urban areas [4], in which the association between UA and incident hypertension was age-dependent. In that study, the relative risk of incident hypertension according to UA levels differed between age groups, with the lower the age group, the higher the risk. In addition, they found that not only age but also sex play an important role in this association. They concluded that this association was age- and sex-dependent and strongest in younger women. However, in that study, as in previous studies [2, 3], residual confounders such as lifestyle remain a limitation.

UA is well known to be greatly affected by lifestyle [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, since lifestyle such as dietary or behavioral patterns is difficult to objectively assess as well as difficult to categorize or quantify as a variable, it is impossible to completely adjust them in statistical analysis. Accordingly, we tried to determine whether age- and sex-dependent association between UA and incident hypertension is consistently observed in two different cohort groups, which are presumed to have different lifestyles. Because the lifestyles of urban and rural residents are inevitably different, the same analysis as in the previous urban-based cohort study was performed on CANVAS, a sub-study of KoGES targeting rural residents.

Although these two distinct cohorts cannot be directly compared, a numerical comparison of the study populations included in each study shows that the rural cohort had a higher mean age and more men, and higher rates of diabetes and hyperlipidemia and hyperuricemia, compared with the urban-based cohort (Supplementary Table 1). Despite these different baseline characteristics, the risk of UA-related incident hypertension was consistently high in both cohort studies, at least in non-elderly women.

Although the role of UA might be relatively high given the low prevalence of comorbidities such as chronic renal insufficiency and diabetes in non-elderly women, it is unclear why the risk of UA-associated hypertension is more pronounced in this group. Intriguingly, serum UA was more associated with metabolic syndrome [18], coronary heart disease [19], and renal insufficiency [20] in women than in men. Given these findings, it is conceivable that women tend to be more susceptible to UA-related cardiovascular disease.

Since most studies on the relationship between UA and the risk of incident hypertension have been conducted on relatively younger employed adults with an average age of 30–40 years, mainly men, few studies have focused on age and sex regarding this association [21,22,23,24,25,26]. As far as we know, one cross-sectional study reported that age and sex might be involved in the association between UA and hypertension [27], and one large-scale longitudinal study suggested that the risk of UA -related incident hypertension was age- and gender-dependent [4]. This study has clinical significance in confirming whether this association is still valid in populations with different characteristics.

This study also has some limitations. As with urban-based cohort study, age groups limited to 40–70 years and residual confounders undermine the value of this study. Also, considering that the concentration of UA can be affected and changed by various environmental factors, the significance of the value at the single point is inevitably limited. Unlike the urban-based cohort, the relatively small number of sample sizes and shorter follow-up duration made it impossible to analyze at a same level to the previous study, so direct comparison between urban and rural areas was not possible.

Conclusions

Even in rural areas, non-elderly women were at a higher risk for UA-related incident hypertension. Age- and sex-dependent association of UA and incident hypertension is also valid in rural residents.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BP:

Blood pressure

CAVAS:

Cardiovascular disease association study

HR:

Hazard ratios

KoGES:

Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study

UA:

Uric acid

References

  1. Feig DI. Hyperuricemia and hypertension. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012;19:377–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang J, Qin T, Chen J, Li Y, Wang L, Huang H, et al. Hyperuricemia and risk of incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grayson PC, Kim SY, LaValley M, Choi HK. Hyperuricemia and incident hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:102–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim W, Go TH, Kang DO, Lee J, Choi JY, Roh SY. N et al. Age and sex dependent association of uric acid and incident hypertension. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2021;31:1200–8.

  5. Gao X, Qi L, Qiao N, Choi HK, Curhan G, Tucker KL, et al. Intake of added sugar and sugar-sweetened drink and serum uric acid concentration in US men and women. Hypertension. 2007;50:306–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caliceti C, Calabria D, Roda A, Cicero AF. Fructose intake, serum uric acid, and cardiometabolic disorders: a critical review. Nutrients. 2017;9:395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu S, Yang H, Guo X, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Ou Q, et al. Prevalence of hyperuricemia and its correlates in rural Northeast Chinese population: from lifestyle risk factors to metabolic comorbidities. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35:1207–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang J, Liu Z, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Sun S, Wang S, et al. The prevalence of hyperuricemia and its correlates in an inland Chinese adult population, urban and rural of Jinan. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:1511–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiong Z, Zhu C, Qian X, Zhu J, Wu Z, Chen L. Serum uric acid is associated with dietary and lifestyle factors in elderly women in suburban Guangzhou in Guangdong province of south China. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013;17:30–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu L, Lou S, Xu K, Meng Z, Zhang Q, Song K. Relationship between lifestyle choices and hyperuricemia in Chinese men and women. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:233–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miao Z, Li C, Chen Y, Zhao S, Wang Y, Wang Z, et al. Dietary and lifestyle changes associated with high prevalence of hyperuricemia and gout in the Shandong coastal cities of Eastern China. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:1859–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim Y, Han BG, KoGES group. Cohort profile: the Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES) consortium. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:e20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bardin T, Richette P. Definition of hyperuricemia and gouty conditions. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26:186–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin KC, Lin HY, Chou P. Community based epidemiological study on hyperuricemia and gout in Kin-Hu, Kinmen. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1045–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jamal A, Phillips E, Gentzke AS, Homa DM, Babb SD, King BA, et al. Current cigarette smoking among adults: United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:53–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoon SS, Dillon CF, Illoh K, Carroll M. Trends in the prevalence of coronary heart disease in the U.S.: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2012. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51:437–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartz SM, Oehlert M, Horton AC, Grucza RA, Fisher SL, Culverhouse RC, et al. Daily drinking is associated with increased mortality. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018;42:2246–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cicero AF, Fogacci F, Giovannini M, Grandi E, Rosticci M, D’Addato S, et al. Serum uric acid predicts incident metabolic syndrome in the elderly in an analysis of the Brisighella Heart Study. Sci Rep. 2018;8:11529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim SY, Guevara JP, Kim KM, Choi HK, Heitjan DF, Albert DA. Hyperuricemia and coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:170–80.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Iseki K, Ikemiya Y, Inoue T, Iseki C, Kinjo K, Takishita S. Significance of hyperuricemia as a risk factor for developing ESRD in a screened cohort. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44:642–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kansui Y, Matsumura K, Morinaga Y, Inoue M, Kiyohara K, Ohta Y, et al. Impact of serum uric acid on incident hypertension in a worksite population of Japanese men. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1499–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Q, Yin YJ, Chen WY, Wu JN, Huang X. Assessment of the association between serum uric acid levels and the incidence of hypertension in nonmetabolic syndrome subjects: a prospective observational study. Med (Baltim). 2018;97:e9765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sung KC, Byrne CD, Ryu S, Lee JY, Lee SH, Kim JY, et al. Baseline and change in uric acid concentration over time are associated with incident hypertension in large Korean cohort. Am J Hypertens. 2017;30:42–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cui LF, Shi HJ, Wu SL, Shu R, Liu N, Wang GY, et al. Association of serum uric acid and risk of hypertension in adults: a prospective study of Kailuan Corporation cohort. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:1103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yokoi Y, Kondo T, Okumura N, Shimokata K, Osugi S, Maeda K, et al. Serum uric acid as a predictor of future hypertension: Stratified analysis based on body mass index and age. Prev Med. 2016;90:201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang T, Chu CH, Bai CH, You SL, Chou YC, Hwang LC, et al. Uric acid concentration as a risk marker for blood pressure progression and incident hypertension: a Chinese cohort study. Metabolism. 2012;61:1747–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee JJ, Ahn J, Hwang J, Han SW, Lee KN, Kim JB, et al. Relationship between uric acid and blood pressure in different age groups. Clin Hypertens. 2015;21:14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Program of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Funding

This work was funded by the Korean Society of Hypertension.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IJK and WK wrote the manuscript. WK analyzed data and created figures. WK and EJK was involved in concept and design. THG, DRK, JYK, and EJK contributed to collecting and analyzing clinical data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Woohyeun Kim.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea University Guro Hospital (No. 2018GR0297). The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the non-interventional, retrospective design of the study. The requirement for written informed consent was waived because of the non-interventional, retrospective design of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Comparison of baseline characteristics between urban-based and rural-based cohorts.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, I.J., Kim, W., Go, T.H. et al. Validation of age- and sex-dependent association of uric acid and incident hypertension in rural areas. Clin Hypertens 28, 24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-022-00206-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-022-00206-5

Keywords

  • Uric acid
  • Hyperuricemia
  • Hypertension