Skip to main content
Download PDF

Familial aggregation and heritability of hypertension in Han population in Shanghai China: a case-control study

Clinical Hypertension volume 25, Article number: 17 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To explore the familial aggregation and heritability of hypertension in Han in Shanghai China.

Methods

According to l:l matched pairs design, 342 patients of hypertension and 342 controls were selected and investigate their nuclear family members in the case-control study. The method of genetic epidemiology research was used to explore the familial aggregation and heritability of hypertension.

Results

The prevalence rate of hypertension of first-degree relatives was significantly higher (34.44%) than that of second- degree relatives (17.60%) and third-degree relatives (13.51%) in Han Population in Shanghai China. Separation ratio p was 0.217, and prevalence rate of case group relatives was higher than that of control group relatives. The results showed a phenomenon of familial aggregation in the distribution of hypertension. The heritability of first- degree relatives was 49.51%; that of second-degree relatives and third-degree relatives were respectively 23.42 and 21.41%.

Conclusion

The distribution of essential hypertension has phenomenon of familial aggregation in Han Population in Shanghai China. The separation ratio of essential hypertension in this study shows that essential hypertension conform to the characteristics of multigene genetic disease. The heritability of first-degree relatives is bigger than that of second-degree relatives and third-degree relatives.

Introduction

Essential hypertension is a disease caused by a variety of factors. Some studies suggest that there are two major factors affecting the incidence of hypertension: one is the genetic factor; the other is environmental factors, such as overweight and obesity, smoking, mental stress, lack of physical activity, high salt intake, and excessive drinking, anxiety, irritability and other emotional factors, lead to an increased serum epinephrine and blood pressure [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]; Shortage of sleep has been demonstrated to be associated with elevated blood pressure as well [11].

Essential hypertension (EH) is a complex disease influenced by genetic and environmental factors, in addition to genetic factors, several evidence suggest that stress contributes to the genesis of EH. There are many studies on genes or chromosomal loci that are linked to EH, but the results are controversial [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. This difference is probably due to the small sample size of single study and the different source of the population. According to the current research data at home and abroad, it is recognized that hypertension is caused by both environmental and genetic factors, the influence of genetic factors on hypertension is about 20–55% [20, 21].

It is now believed that the genetic factor of hypertension is made up of a number of pathogenic genes that have a small but cumulative effect. But so far, the susceptibility genes for hypertension have not been finalized. Because of the different origin and stratification of the population, it is a challenge to find the gene of essential hypertension. The main reason for the challenge may be genetic heterogeneity and confounding factors. The genes associated with essential hypertension may be a group and micro effect mode, each of which plays a different role in different stages of the formation and development of hypertension and interacts with each other. The interaction between genes and genes, genes and environment, environment and environment leads to different risk of hypertension among different populations and individuals. By the dose effect relationship of quantitative characters, the critical threshold of the occurrence of the disease is reached, and the genetic susceptibility to essential hypertension is determined simultaneously.

This study uses methods of case-control and genetic epidemiology study, based on the investigation of the essential hypertension patient family and the control family, to explore the familial aggregation and heritability of hypertension in Shanghai China.

Methods

Determination of the core family in case group

All patients were randomly selected from hypertension registry and follow-up management system in Jiading district in Shanghai. The diagnosis of case was defined by the outpatient or inpatient diagnosis in clinical hospitals, the blood pressure was based on clinical blood pressure in hospitals. All patients were confirmed by hospital and verified by follow-up in the community, and they were able to correctly respond to the investigators for health information of themselves and their nuclear family members. Every patient gave informed consent to participate in the study which was approved by the local ethics committee (JD-2016-KY-18). Total 342 patients were selected, among these patients there are Han races, and there are 173 male cases, average age 61.3 ± 11.3 years old; 169 female cases, average age 63.6 ± 10.1 years old.

Determination of the core family in control group

According to l:l matched pairs design, all controls population had no hypertension, and controls are required the same sex as cases, same race, living in the same community, and the difference of age is not more than 5 years old and at the same age group. Every control gave informed consent to participate in the study. They were able to correctly respond to the investigators for the health information of themselves and their nuclear family members. Total 342 control population were selected, among these controls there are Han races, and there are 173 male, average age 61.1 ± 11.1 years old; 169 female, average age 62.4 ± 10.3 years old.

Standard of case diagnosis and inclusion

All patient patients were over 18 years old, who has been diagnosed by the hospital as essential hypertension, excluding secondary hypertension, such as renal artery stenosis, pheochromocytoma, hyperaldosteronism and other diseases.

Family survey method and content

Investigation was conducted by trained public health investigators, using a unified questionnaire. Using direct survey method, the contents of the questionnaire mainly include: age, sex, race, age of onset, diagnosis time, hospital name, family members and so on. The family investigation mainly includes: spouses, parents, siblings, children, uncle, aunt and cousin. The criteria for judging whether all the respondents had essential hypertension (all relatives of the case and the control population): whether they had been diagnosed with essential hypertension in the hospital before this investigation. If they had been diagnosed with essential hypertension in the hospital, it is “Yes”; if they had not been diagnosed, it is “No”.

Statistical analysis method

Statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software package (IBM SPSS statistics version 21). When P values < 0.05, the difference is considered statistically significant. Using Falconer method to calculate heritability of three degree relatives, and the genetic model was evaluated by modified Weinberg method [22].

Separation ratio estimation

Separation ratio P is: P = \( \frac{\boldsymbol{R}-\boldsymbol{J}}{\boldsymbol{T}-\boldsymbol{J}} \) (T is the total number of siblings; R is the number of case in their siblings; J is family number only one case among their siblings).

Standard error (SE) is: SE(p) \( =\sqrt{\frac{\left(R-J\right)\left(T-R\right)}{{\left(T-J\right)}^2}+\frac{2Q{\left(T-R\right)}^2}{{\left(T-J\right)}^4}} \) (Q is siblings number of two patient, and the others are the same as above).

Heritability estimation

Heritability (h2) is: h2 = \( \frac{\mathbf{1}}{\boldsymbol{r}}\ast \frac{\boldsymbol{P}\mathbf{0}\left(\boldsymbol{X}\mathbf{0}-\boldsymbol{X}\mathbf{1}\right)}{\boldsymbol{a}\mathbf{0}} \) (r is genetic similarity coefficient; p0 is non-incidence probability of relatives in the control group, p0 = 1-q0, q0 is the incidence of relatives in control group); x0 is normal deviation of the average of relatives susceptibility to threshold in the control group; x1 is normal deviation of the average of relatives susceptibility to threshold in the case group; a0 is normal deviation of patient’s susceptibility to susceptibility of relatives in the control group. x0, x1 and a0 value can obtained by referring to the simplified Falconer table according to the prevalence rate).

Standard error (SE) is: SE(h2) = \( \frac{1}{r}\ast \sqrt{\frac{P1}{A{(a1)}^2}\ast {\left(\frac{P0}{a0}\right)}^2} \) (p1 is non-incidence probability of relatives in the case group, p1 = 1-q1, q1 is the incidence of relatives in the case group; A is case number; a1 is normal deviation of patient’s susceptibility to susceptibility of relatives in the case group; and the others are the same as above. a1and a0 value can obtained by referring to the simplified Falconer table according to the prevalence rate).

Results

Basic situation of the family

In this study, 342 patient cases and 342 control population were investigated, average age in the case group was 62.4 ± 10.7 years old, and average age in the control group was 61.7 ± 10.7 years old. Among these investigated people, they are all Han races, so no racial analysis will be conducted. The difference of age between case group and control group were not significant (tage = 0.894, Page = 0.372). The comparison of investigation variables between case group and control group showed in Table 1.

Table 1 The comparison of investigation variables between case group and control group
Full size table

Total number of nuclear family members investigated was 8599 (4353 in case group, 4246 in control group), and the average nuclear family member was 12.57 (case group is 12.73; control group is 12.42). Among the investigated population, there were 3386 in the first-degree relatives, the average nuclear family member was 4.95; and 3103 in the second- degree relatives, the average nuclear family member was 4.54; and 2110 in the third-degree relatives, the average nuclear family member was 3.08.

Family prevalence

There were 1997 hypertensive patient has been clearly diagnosed in the hospital among this investigated population in this study, the average prevalence was 23.22%. The prevalence rate of hypertension of first-degree relatives was 34.44%; prevalence rate of second- degree relatives was 17.60%; prevalence rate of third-degree relatives was 13.51%. This result showed that the order of hypertension prevalence rate was as follows: first-degree relatives > second- degree relatives > third-degree relatives.

All prevalence rates of hypertension of case group relatives were significantly higher than that of control group relatives. The result showed a phenomenon of familial aggregation in the distribution of hypertension.

Among these family members and relatives in case and control group, there were 517 hypertension in parent population, the prevalence was 44.84%; 549 in sibling population, the prevalence was 39.96%; 100 in offspring population, the average prevalence was 11.64%; 291 in paternal siblings population (brother and sister of father), the prevalence was 18.27%; 255 in maternal siblings population (brother and sister of mother), the prevalence was 16.89%; 46 in paternal cousin population, the prevalence was 13.11%; 239 in maternal cousin population, the prevalence was 13.59. The difference of hypertension prevalence in three level relative populations between case group and control group were significant (see Table 2).

Table 2 The hypertension prevalence rate (%) of relatives in case and control group
Full size table

Separation ratio analysis

According Table 3 and separation ratio calculated formula above, separation ratio p = (891–580)/(2013–580) = 0.217; standard error = SQRT (0.0001186 + 2*163* 2.98E-07) =0.015, and 95% confidence interval (CI) was (0.188, 0.245). According to the theory of genetic epidemiology, theoretical separation ratio is 50% in monogenic dominant inheritance; theoretical separation ratio is 25% in monogenic recessive inheritance. This result suggested that the genetic pattern of hypertension does not belong to monogenic dominant or recessive hereditary disease. This study is inclined to consider essential hypertension may be multigene recessive hereditary disease.

Table 3 The separation ratio estimate in first-degree relatives
Full size table

Heritability analysis

According to methods of genetic epidemiology analysis, genetic similarity coefficient of first, second and third degree relatives were respectively 0.5, 0.25 and 0.125. the calculated results showed that the heritability of hypertension of different degree relatives was different. In this study, the heritability of first-degree relatives was 49.508%; and heritability of second-degree relatives and third-degree relatives were respectively 23.416 and 21.407% (see Table 4). The order of heritability was as follows: first-degree relatives > second- degree relatives > third-degree relatives.

Table 4 The heritability (%) and 95% CI of hypertension of different degree relatives
Full size table

Discussion

It is well known that the genetic factors play an important basic role in the occurrence of hypertension, and family history is a sign reflecting the main role of genetic factors. It’s showed that family history plays an important role in the development of hypertension through interaction with acquired risk factors such as body mass index (BMI), and the interaction of family history and BMI is greater than the sum of two independent actions [23]. In this study, the genetic epidemiological results showed that the prevalence of hypertension in three degree relatives was different. The prevalence in the first degree relatives (including parents, siblings and offspring) was the highest (34.44%), the prevalence in the second degree relatives (including paternal siblings and maternal siblings) was the next (17.60%), and the prevalence in the third degree relatives (including paternal cousin and maternal cousin) was lowest (13.51%). The difference of hypertension prevalence among three degree relatives in Han in Shanghai China were significantly (P < 0.05). It was suggested that genetic factors have obvious influence on the occurrence of essential hypertension, and the genetic potency may be decrease with the increase of degree relatives.

In this study, Hypertension confirmation was based on the definite diagnosis of the hospital. Considering incomplete recognition of hypertension patients in this investigated population, the separation ratio calculation was used the modified calculation formula. With regard to the genetic pattern of essential hypertension, the result in this study showed the separation ratio of essential hypertension was 0.217, 95% CI was (0.188, 0.245). This result showed that separation ratio of essential hypertension was lower than 0.25 of the genetic rule of Mendel single gene, which conforms to the characteristics of multigene genetic disease [24, 25]. It indicated that the occurrence of essential hypertension is a common effect produced by multiple genes with minor effects under certain environmental factors, rather than the action of single gene. The effect of a single gene may be relatively small.

At present, method of estimating the heritability of polygenic disease is generally accepted to calculate the heritability based on the threshold theory of Falconer [26]. In this study, the heritability of first-degree relatives was 49.508%, within the average heritability reported in the relevant literature (20–55%) [20, 21], and lower than Tibetan (77.2%) [27]. it indicates that there are also ethnic differences in hypertension susceptibility genes among different ethnic groups. In this study, the heritability of second-degree relatives and third-degree relatives were respectively 23.42 and 21.41%. The order of hypertension heritability was as follows: first-degree relatives > second- degree relatives > third-degree relatives. From the above stratified analysis results, the effect of genetic factors on the incidence of essential hypertension may be more obvious in first-degree relatives, and fell obviously as the level of kinship declined. The above results show that the occurrence of hypertension in the Han population in Shanghai, China, is affected by both genetic and environmental factors, which is consistent with the reports of relevant manufacturers [28,29,30]. The formation of polygenic diseases is influenced by both the genetic and environmental factors, in which the size of the genetic factor is represented by the heritability. The estimated heritability in this study could not completely eliminate the confounding effect of environmental factors. We will further analyze the interaction between genetic factors and environmental factors in the next study.

Conclusion

The distribution of essential hypertension has phenomenon of familial aggregation in Han Population in Shanghai China.

The separation ratio of essential hypertension in this study shows that essential hypertension conform to the characteristics of multigene genetic disease.

The heritability of first-degree relatives is bigger than that of second-degree relatives and third-degree relatives.

Availability of data and materials

The questionnaire and database supporting the conclusions of this article are available, through contact with anle_li@aliyun.com.

References

  1. Aune D, Sen A, Norat T, et al. Body mass index, abdominal fatness, and heart failure incidence and mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Circulation. 2016;133(7):639–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Modesti PA, Agostoni P, Agyemang C, et al. Cardiovascular risk assessment in low-resource settings: a consensus document of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on hypertension and cardiovascular risk in low resource settings. J Hypertens. 2014;32(5):951–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kotchen TA. Obesity-related hypertension: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical management. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23(11):1170–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biino G, Parati G, Concas MP, Adamo M, Angius A, Vaccargiu S, Pirastu M. Environmental and genetic contribution to hypertension prevalence:data from an epidemiological survey on Sardinian genetic isolates. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Batty GD, Kivimäki M, Kengne AP. Risk models to predict hypertension: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67370. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu D, Reynolds K, Wu X, Chen J, Duan X, Muntner P, Huang G, Reynolds RF, Su S, Whelton PK, He J, InterASIA Collaborative Group, The International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in ASIA. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in China. Hypertension. 2002;40:920–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Izawa H, Yamada Y, Okada T, Tanaka M, Hirayama H, Yokota M. Prediction of genetic risk for hypertension. Hypertension. 2003;41:1035–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Whelton PK, He J, Appel LJ, et al. Primary prevention of hypertension: clinical and public health advisory from the National High Blood Pressure Education Program. JAMA. 2002;288(15):1882–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kingsbury MA, Rehen SK, Contos JJ, Higgins CM, Chun J. Non-proliferative effects of lysophosphatidic acid enhance cortical growth and folding. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1292–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaw KK, Latt TS, Aung PP, et al. Prevalence of hypertension and its associated factors in the adult population in Yangon division, Myanmar. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2011;23(4):496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Contos JJ, Fukushima N, Weiner JA, Kaushal D, Chun J. Requirement for the lpa1 lysophosphatidic acid receptor gene in normal suckling behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:13384–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rafiq S, Anand S, Roberts R. Genome-wide association studies of hypertension: have they been fruitful? Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010;3(3):189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies, Ehret GB, Munroe PB, et al. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature. 2011;478(7367):103–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy D, Ehret GB, Rice K, et al. Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):677–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Newton-Cheh C, Johnson T, Gateva V, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure. Nat Genet. 2009;41(6):666–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kato N, Takeuchi F, Tabara Y, et al. Meta—analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common variants associated with blood pressure variation in east Asians. Nat Genet. 2011;43(6):53 1–538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lahiri D, Maloney B. Genes are not our destiny:the somaticepitype bridges between the genotype and the phenotype. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(12). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2022-c1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Uher R. Ne implications of gene-environmem interactions in depression:will cause inform cure? MoI Psychiatry. 2008;13(12):1070–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. EhreI GB. Genome-wide association studies:contribution of genomic to understanding blood pressure and essential hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2010;12:17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeanemaitre X, Gimenez-Roqueplo A, Disse-Nicodeme S, et al. Emery and rimoin’s principles and practice of medical genetics e-dition principles of medic H genetics. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2007. p. 283–330.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshiji Yamada, Kota Matsui, Ichiro Takeuchi, Mitsutoshi Oguri, Tetsuo Fujimaki. Association of genetic variants with hypertension in a longitudinal population-based genetic epidemiological study [J]. Int J Mol Med. 2015;35(5):1189–98.

  22. Zhao Z. Epidemiological Research Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. Beijing: Science Press; 2005. p. 230.

  23. Li A-l, Peng Q, Shao Y-q, Fang X, Zhang Y-y. The effect of body mass index and its interaction with family history on hypertension: a case–control study. Clin Hypertens. 2019;25(6):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sham P. Genetic epidemiology. Br Med Bull. 1996;52:408–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sundquist K, Li X, Hemminki K. Familial risk of ischemie and hemorrhagic stroke: a large-scale study ofthe Swedish population. Stroke. 2006;37:1668–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao Z. Epidemiological Research Methods and Applications. Beijing: Science Press; 2000. p. 8.

  27. Dronmatsering, Zhuang L-p, Cui C-y, Rindan, Banpa, Norpu G, Tashi P, et al. Genetic basis of essential hypertension in Tibetan. Natl Med J China. 2002;82(15):1009–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Salfati E, Morrison AC, Boerwinkle E, Chakravarti A. Direct estimates of the genomic contributions to blood pressure heritability within a population-based cohort (ARIC). PLoS One. 2015;10:1371–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meng Y, Groth S, Quinn JR, Bisognano J, Wu TT. An exploration of gene-gene interactions and their effects on hypertension. Int J Genomics. 2017;2017:318–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Waken RJ, de las Fuentes L, Rao DC. A review of the genetics of hypertension with a focus on gene-environment interactions. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2017;19(3):23–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Heartfelt thanks to all doctors, nurses and public health workers in 13 community health service centers in Jiading district in Shanghai for their hard work. Thank for some advice of the experts!

Funding

This study was funded by Jiading district health and family planning commission research project in Shanghai(N0:2016-KY-18).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Jiading District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China

    An-le Li, Xiang Fang, Yi-ying Zhang, Qian Peng & Xian-hong Yin

Authors
  1. An-le Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiang Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yi-ying Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qian Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xian-hong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The original idea for the project was conceived by AL. XF, YZ, QP. XY participated in the collection of early data, quality control, and gave a lot of administrative support. AL conceptualized the paper, analyzed data and wrote a first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to subsequent drafts and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An-le Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted by Jiading district center for disease control and prevention research ethics committee. All subjects gave informed consent to participate in the study, they would like to participate in investigation and answer all the related questions in the questionnaire.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Al., Fang, X., Zhang, Yy. et al. Familial aggregation and heritability of hypertension in Han population in Shanghai China: a case-control study. Clin Hypertens 25, 17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-019-0122-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-019-0122-z

Keywords

Clinical Hypertension

ISSN: 2056-5909

Contact us