Open Access

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio reflects the severity of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and concurrent hypertension

  • Yeo-Jeong Song1,
  • Jae Hwan Kwon2,
  • Joo Yeon Kim2,
  • Bo Young Kim3 and
  • Kyoung Im Cho4Email author
Contributed equally
Clinical Hypertension201622:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-015-0036-3

Received: 15 September 2015

Accepted: 15 December 2015

Published: 4 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Chronic intermittent hypoxia, platelet activation and inflammation all play roles in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), which may increase the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as a new biomarker showing systemic inflammation and platelet distribution width (PDW) as an indicator of platelet activation to the severity of OSAS.

Methods

A total of 290 patients suspected with OSAS who underwent a full night of polysomnography were included. The patients were placed into 4 separate groups according to their apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores; the control group (AHI <5), mild OSAS group (AHI 5–15), moderate OSAS group (AHI 16–30), and severe OSAS group (AHI >30). CVD risk was defined by the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, current smoking, and dyslipidemia.

Results

Higher AHI groups were significantly correlated with increasing age, body mass index, systolic blood pressure and male sex. PLR and PDW were also significantly associated with AHI (r = 0.417 for PLR and r = 0.227 for PDW, all p-values < 0.001) and the Epworth sleepiness scale (r = 0.160 for PLR and r = 0.189 for PDW, all p-values <0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that AHI ≥9.2 (adjusted odds ratios [OR] 5.03, 95 % confidential interval (CI) = 1.67-15.2, p = 0.004) and PLR ≥159 (adjusted OR 2.81, 95 % CI = 1.34-5.91, p = 0.006) were independently associated with the presence of hypertension.

Conclusion

PLR and PDW are associated with OSAS severity. PLR may also be useful as a systemic biomarker for the concurrent hypertension in OSAS patients.

Keywords

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio Obstructive sleep apnea Hypertension

Background

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) induces hypoxia and hypercapnia, which adversely affect the myocardial oxygen supply. These changes ultimately contribute to the development of altered metabolic, immune, and inflammatory systemic responses [1]. Several studies have previously demonstrated that obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [2, 3] including coronary artery disease and stroke [4, 5]. There is some evidence suggesting that OSAS is associated with low-levels of systemic inflammation and oxidative stress [1]. This chronic inflammation in OSAS may play an important role in the progression of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [69]. Therefore, it is important to clarify the association between inflammation and disease severity in order to determine the influence of OSAS on CVD.

Increased platelet activation plays a major role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis [10]. Recent studies have also introduced a new inflammatory marker, the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), which can predict adverse outcomes in CVD [11, 12]. Furthermore, interactions between platelets, leukocytes and endothelial cells during the inflammatory cascade may promote atherosclerotic changes [1214]. During an inflammatory response, there is an increase in the platelet number and platelet swelling, both of which may affect the platelet distribution width (PDW) [15, 16]. The PLR and PDW are both relatively easy to measure as routine laboratory biomarkers of systemic inflammation. However, there is little data regarding their usefulness in patients with OSAS. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between PLR, PDW and OSAS severity, as assessed by polysomnographic parameters. In addition, we investigated the role of PLR in hypertension, and the association between PLR and AHI severity.

Methods

Patient selection

This is a retrospective cohort study performed at two centers. A total of 290 patients who had undergone polysomnography between January 2010 and December 2014 were evaluated. Patients were considered for inclusion if they were between 18 and 80 years old, had normal renal function and regular menstruation (with regard to the women included). Patients were excluded if any of the following criteria applied: systemic disease such as liver disease; neurologic disorders or malignancy; secondary hypertension; respiratory infection and failure; critical illness with poor functional status; refractory arrhythmia; history of heart failure; history of acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction and/or any revascularization procedure. Demographic characteristics including age, sex, height, weight, current medications, smoking history and other diseases were recorded at first visit. Patients were assessed for any CVD risk factors including the presence or absence of medically diagnosed hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and current smoking status. Blood pressure (BP) was measured with using a standard mercury manometer. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP (SBP) ≥140 mmHg, diastolic BP (DBP) ≥90 mmHg and/or current use of antihypertensive drugs. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as the ratio of dry weight in kilograms to height in meters squared. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Polysomnography

The full night polysomnography (PSG) studies used for OSAS diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed. Full night PSG (Embla N7000, Broomfield CO, USA) examination was performed using a device equipped with a snoring sensor, respiratory effort sensors, pressure sensor, body position center, thermister, electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse oximeter with oxygen saturation, lower extremity electromyography and chest excursion. The value index of PSG testing included AHI scores, percentage of sleep efficacy, total sleep time, baseline/lowest oxygen saturation, and the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). The ESS was evaluated before PSG using a survey. Apnea was defined as a standstill in the airflow for more than 10 s. Hypopnea was defined as ≥30 % reduction in airway flow for more than 10 s followed by a decrease of approximately 4 % in the patient’s oxygen saturation [17]. AHI was used as an index to represent the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. It is defined as the average frequency of apnea and hypopnea events per hour during sleep. The subjects were distributed into four groups according to their AHI scores: the control group with AHI <5, mild OSAS group with AHI 5–15, moderate OSAS group with AHI 16–30, and severe OSAS group with AHI score >30.

Laboratory measurements

The biochemical parameters analyzed included total cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting glucose, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and complete blood cell count. The PLR was calculated by dividing the lymphocyte from the platelet.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using the commercially available computer program SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are presented as means ± standard deviations for continuous variables and their percentages (%) for categorical data. The Mann - Whitney U test was used for continuous variables and the chi-square test was used for categorical data. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the data’s normality. Parameter differences among the three groups were evaluated using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or the Kruskal–Wallis test for normally or non-normally distributed variables, respectively. The Tukey test was used for multiple comparisons. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to determine relationships between variables. Linear association analysis was used to verify the correlations between variables. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to estimate the cutoff values for AHI and PLR in the prediction of hypertension. Multivariate logistic regression models were built to determine which variables are independently associated with concurrent hypertension. Two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

There was a total 290 patients including 193 men (66.6 %) and 97 women (33.4 %) included in this study. The mean age was 48.6 ± 13.4 years (range: 18–78). There were 61 control patients, 67 mild OSAS, 61 moderate OSAS, and 101 severe OSAS patients. Table 1 shows the baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of each group. In general, the OSAS groups had older patients with significantly more men than did the control group. In addition, the BMI, SBP, heart rate, and fasting blood glucose were higher in the OSAS groups than the control group. Age, BMI, and male proportion increased significantly with increasing AHI. The prevalence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus was significantly higher in the moderate/severe OSAS group than they were in the control group (all p-values < 0.05, Fig. 1). In addition, as the OSAS severity increased, there were significant gradual increases in PLR (controls: 99.5 ± 42.1, mild OSAS; 113.8 ± 45.2, moderate OSAS; 121.3 ± 62.9 and severe OSAS; 138.6 ± 59.9, p = 0.001, Fig. 2a) and in PDW (controls: 15.9 ± 1.12, mild OSAS; 16.3 ± 0.95, moderate OSAS; 16.4 ± 0.99 and severe OSAS; 16.5 ± 0.82, p = 0.003). Table 2 shows the polysomnography data among the 4 groups. With increasing AHI, there were significant stepwise decreases in the total sleep time and the saturation value, and significant increase in ESS. As expected, there were significant differences between the AHI groups with regard to the pre ESS score, baseline saturation and lowest saturation (all p-values <0.05).
Table 1

Baseline patient characteristics

 

Control (n = 61)

Mild OSAS (n = 67)

Moderate OSAS (n = 61)

Severe OSAS (n = 101)

ANOVA p

Age, years

44.0 ± 15.4

48.2 ± 13.4

49.1 ± 11.8

51.4 ± 12.5*

0.003

Male, n (%)

33 (54.1)

39 (58.2)

41 (67.2)*

80 (79.2)*

<0.001

BMI, kg/m2

24.2 ± 4.43

24.7 ± 3.20

26.4 ± 3.58*,+

26.9 ± 3.41*,+

<0.001

SBP, mmHg

123.4 ± 13.7

123.5 ± 13.1

128.5 ± 13.6*

128.2 ± 12.4*

0.027

DBP, mmHg

78.4 ± 10.7

77.0 ± 8.9

80.8 ± 9.2

81.2 ± 9.9*

0.039

Heart rate, /min

72.6 ± 7.90

73.3 ± 10.3

76.3 ± 10.5

76.7 ± 9.15*

0.020

Hypertension, n (%)

5 (8.2)

13 (19.4)

18 (29.5)*

30 (29.7)*

0.005

Diabetes mellitus, n (%)

1 (1.6)

2 (3.0)

4 (6.6)

13 (12.9) *

0.048

Dyslipidemia, n (%)

2 (3.3)

2 (3.0)

3 (4.9)

3 (3.0)

0.917

Smoking, n (%)

6 (9.8)

14 (20.9)

12 (19.7)

18 (17.8)

0.123

Total cholesterol, mg/dl

170.0 ± 38.2

184.0 ± 34.6

190.6 ± 45.6

172.4 ± 46.9

0.161

TG, mg/dl

141.1 ± 84.8

151.2 ± 8.03

160.8 ± 89.1

176.1 ± 144.9

0.606

FBS, mg/dl

101.5 ± 17.2

92.8 ± 10.3

105.8 ± 21.7

111.6 ± 45.3

0.034

ESR, mm/hr

7.8 ± 11.6

17.9 ± 30.2

15.5 ± 15.3

14.0 ± 10.9

0.224

hs-CRP, mg/L

0.53 ± 1.32

1.14 ± 2.28

0.82 ± 1.38

1.12 ± 2.08

0.529

WBC, x106/L

6759 ± 1806

7283 ± 2031

7314 ± 2976

7724 ± 2051

0.103

Neutrophil, %

53.1 ± 11.2

59.1 ± 11.0

55.1 ± 13.8

60.5 ± 10.3*

0.001

Lymphocyte, %

36.1 ± 9.87

33.0 ± 12.8

30.0 ± 9.22

27.4 ± 8.35*

<0.001

Eosinophil, %

2.24 ± 1.66

3.01 ± 2.03

2.60 ± 1.99

2.90 ± 2.16

0.217

Monocyte, %

7.91 ± 2.54

7.44 ± 2.15

8.51 ± 5.96

7.35 ± 1.71

0.234

RBC, x109/L

4587 ± 423.9

4692 ± 377.2

4660 ± 282.4

4599 ± 378.1

0.286

Hemoglobin, g/dl

13.5 ± 1.5

14.0 ± 1.4

13.8 ± 1.6

14.4 ± 1.6*

0.004

Hematocrit, %

40.2 ± 4.4

41.2 ± 4.2

40.2 ± 6.6

42.5 ± 4.5*

0.010

RDW, %

13.5 ± 1.57

13.3 ± 1.25

13.5 ± 1.05

13.3 ± 0.76

0.735

Platelet, x109/L

216.7 ± 54.4

224.8 ± 56.0

231.3 ± 80.6

252.4 ± 66.8*

0.007

PLR

99.5 ± 42.1

113.8 ± 45.2

121.3 ± 62.9*

138.6 ± 59.9*

0.001

PDW, %

15.9 ± 1.12

16.3 ± 0.95

16.4 ± 0.99*

16.5 ± 0.82*

0.003

All values are presented as means ± SD. BP, blood pressure; hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; OSAS: obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; TG, triglyceride; FBS, fasting blood sugar; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; WBC, white blood cell; RBC, white blood cell; RDW, red cell distribution width; PLR, platelet lymphocyte ratio; PDW, platelet volume distribution width, *p < 0.05 vs. control group, + p < 0.05 vs. mild OSAS group

Fig. 1

The prevalences of hypertension and diabetes mellitus were significantly higher in the moderate/severe OSAS group than they were in the control group

Fig. 2

The relationship between platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and the clinical features of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). a There were gradual but significant increases in the PLR (controls: 99.5 ± 42.1, mild OSAS; 113.8 ± 45.2, moderate OSAS; 121.3 ± 62.9 and severe OSAS; 138.6 ± 59.9, p = 0.001). b The PLR was most significantly elevated in OSAS patients with hypertension compared to those without and to controls

Table 2

Group comparison according to polysomnographic parameters

 

Control (n = 61)

Mild OSAS (n = 67)

Moderate OSAS (n = 61)

Severe OSAS (n = 101)

ANOVA p

AHI

1.91 ± 1.69

9.14 ± 3.03*

21.5 ± 4.98*,+

72.5 ± 51.7*,+

<0.001

Sleep efficiency, %

81.0 ± 9.14

81.0 ± 9.91

82.0 ± 10.3

77.1 ± 13.1*

0.026

Total sleep time, min

322.8 ± 44.8

298.7 ± 60.4

292.2 ± 62.4

257.0 ± 78.2*

<0.001

Stage 1, min

58.2 ± 32.0

39.5 ± 37.9

48.2 ± 53.7

73.5 ± 59.8*

0.006

Stage 2, min

139.6 ± 71.8

103.2 ± 67.3

125.7 ± 69.6

70.9 ± 43.30*

<0.001

Baseline SaO2, %

97.3 ± 0.96

95.5 ± 1.77

93.9 ± 3.07

92.0 ± 4.87*

<0.001

Lowest SaO2, %

91.3 ± 3.09

88.4 ± 3.82

81.3 ± 8.68*

79.0 ± 8.87*

<0.001

ESS

8.7 ± 4.6

8.9 ± 5.2

10.4 ± 5.9

11.6 ± 6.0*

0.029

AHI: apnea-hypopnea index; ESS: Epworth sleepiness scale

*p < 0.05 vs. control group, +p < 0.05 vs. mild OSAS group

Then, we analyzed the correlations between inflammatory markers and the clinical OSAS factors. PLR was significantly associated with AHI (r = 0.417, p <0.001, Fig. 3a), minimum O2 saturation values (r = −0.192, p = 0.005), ESS (r = 0.160, p = 0.047) and hs-CRP (r = 0.367, p < 0.001). In addition, PDW was significantly correlated with AHI (r = 0.227, p <0.001, Fig. 3b), minimum O2 saturation values (r = −0.165, p = 0.011) and ESS (r = 0.189, p = 0.018). However, red blood cell count (RBC) showed no significant correlation with AHI (r = −0.103, p = 0.081). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PLR (beta = 0.358, p <0.001) and PDW (beta = 0.186, p = 0.002) were independently associated with AHI after adjustment of the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 and current smoking status.
Fig. 3

The correlations between inflammatory markers and clinical factors of OSAS. a The platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was significantly associated with the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (r = 0.417, p <0.001). b The platelet distribution width (PDW) was significantly correlated with AHI (r = 0.227, p <0.001)

In sub-group analysis, OSAS patients with hypertension were found to have significantly higher AHI, ESS, PLR and PDW values than do those without hypertension (Table 3). Among these parameters, PLR and AHI were most significantly elevated in OSAS patients with hypertension compared to those without and to controls (Fig. 2b, Table 3). Furthermore, hypertension was significantly associated with AHI ≥9.2 (ROC area under curve: 0.66, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.60–0.71, p < 0.001) and PLR ≥159 (ROC area under curve: 0.66, 95 % CI = 0.59–0.72, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that AHI ≥9.2 (adjusted odds ratios [OR] 5.03, 95 % CI 1.67-15.2, p = 0.004) and PLR ≥159 (adjusted OR 2.81, 95 % CI = 1.34-5.91, p = 0.006) were independently associated with the concurrent hypertension in OSAS after adjusting for age, male gender, and BMI (Table 4).
Table 3

OSAS patient characteristics according to the presence of hypertension

 

Control (n = 61)

OSAS without HTN (n = 168)

OSAS with HTN (n = 61)

ANOVA p

Age, years

44.0 ± 15.4

48.9 ± 13.0*

52.4 ± 11.4*

0.002

Male, n (%)

33 (54.1)

115 (68.5)

45 (73.8)

0.051

BMI, kg/m2

24.2 ± 4.4

26.0 ± 3.5*

26.6 ± 3.1*

0.001

SBP, mmHg

123.4 ± 13.7

125.7 ± 12.7

130.1 ± 13.6*

0.018

DBP, mmHg

78.4 ± 10.7

78.8 ± 9.0

82.4 ± 10.1*

0.031

Heart rate, /min

73.3 ± 10.3

74.4 ± 9.4

72.0 ± 9.2

0.177

Diabetes mellitus, n (%)

4 (6.5)

9 (5.4)

7 (11.5)

0.255

Dyslipidemia, n (%)

2 (3.3)

6 (3.6)

2 (3.3)

0.993

Smoking, n (%)

6 (9.8)

32 (19.0)

14 (23.0)

0.120

Total cholesterol, mg/dl

170.0 ± 38.2

186.1 ± 44.9

169.0 ± 38.6

0.082

TG, mg/dl

151.2 ± 80.3

157.5 ± 110.1

174.1 ± 128.3

0.716

FBS, mg/dl

101.5 ± 17.2

103.9 ± 33.7

109.9 ± 35.9

0.513

ESR, mm/hr

7.8 ± 11.6

16.4 ± 19.3

12.4 ± 11.2

0.095

hs CRP, mg/L

0.53 ± 1.32

1.02 ± 2.10

1.07 ± 1.61

0.427

PLR

99.5 ± 42.3

121.4 ± 55.5*

147.9 ± 61.8*

<0.001

PDW, %

15.9 ± 1.12

16.37 ± 0.81*

16.44 ± 1.13*

0.002

AHI

1.91 ± 1.69

33.8 ± 30.1*

58.2 ± 68.3*

<0.001

ESS

8.65 ± 4.64

10.1 ± 5.85*

12.4 ± 5.40*

0.009

BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR: heart rate; TG: triglyceride; FBS: fasting blood sugar; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; hs-CRP, highly sensitive C-reactive protein; PLR, platelet lymphocyte ratio; PDW, platelet volume distribution width; AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; ESS, Epworth sleepiness scale; *p < 0.05 vs. control group

Table 4

Binary regression analysis of hypertension

Parameters

Odd ratio (95 % CI)

p-value

Adjusted Odd ratio (95 % CI)

p-value

Age, years

1.03 (1.01 to 1.05)

0.011

1.02 (0.99 to 1.05)

0.081

BMI, kg/m2

1.06 (0.99 to 1.14)

0.103

1.00 (0.90 to 1.10)

0.949

Male gender (%)

1.21 (0.67 to 2.18)

0.538

1.31 (0.57 to 2.84)

0.554

AHI ≥9.2

5.45 (2.38 to 12.48)

<0.001

5.03(1.67 to 15.2)

0.004

PLR ≥159

3.37 (1.67 to 6.79)

0.001

2.81 (1.34 to 5.91)

0.006

CI, confidence intervals, BMI, body mass index; AHI, apnea-hypopnea index; PLR, platelet lymphocyte ratio

Discussion

In the present study, we showed that the indicator of platelet activation (PDW) and systemic inflammation (PLR) were both found to be significantly associated with OSAS severity (reflected by AHI). In addition, we have demonstrated that PLR may be a systemic biomarker that is independently associated with concurrent hypertension in OSAS patients. OSAS is a chronic disease that is frequently associated with various comorbidities including cognitive impairment, CVD, pulmonary disease, endocrine dysfunction, and neuropsychiatric problems [1820]. The exact mechanism of OSAS and its subsequent comorbidities is not known. However, chronic systemic inflammation has been proposed in several recent studies as a possible mechanism [2123]. Although the inflammation plays an important role in the progression and destabilization of atherosclerosis and CVD [24, 25], it is unclear if this it is the cause or result of OSAS. There have been conflicting reports on the relationship between inflammatory markers and the degree of the upper airway obstruction [26, 27]. Korkmaz M. et al. [26] showed that the traditional inflammatory markers such as CRP and ESR cannot predict the severity of the level of systemic inflammation in OSAS patients. Because systemic inflammation and resultant vascular insult is an important underlying mechanism in OSAS, exploring new inflammatory markers in OSAS may offer more information in order to predict the risk of associated diseases.

The PLR combines the predictive risk of platelet and lymphocyte counts into a new prognostic marker of inflammation for many types of cardiovascular disease including hypertension, coronary artery disease, occlusive peripheral arterial disease [11, 12], and atherosclerosis [28]. Elevated platelet counts reflect underlying inflammatory states, because platelets are acute phase reactants that are produced in response to various stimuli including systemic infections, inflammatory conditions, bleeding, and tumors. Low levels of lymphocytes represent an uncontrolled inflammatory pathway. Therefore, an elevated PLR is a useful inflammatory marker because it reflects the increase in platelet count, and decrease in lymphocyte count in an inflammatory state [29]. In the present study, we selected PLR as a potential inflammatory marker because it is easily calculated using the results of routine peripheral blood tests, and reflects systemic inflammation in OSAS patients. In addition, PDW increases with changes in platelet morphology and size, both of which occur in inflammatory states [16]. We hypothesized that both PLR and PDW would linearly increase according to the severity of OSAS. Both of these responses were demonstrated in this study, and because RBC showed no significant correlation with AHI, the correlation between PLR or PDW and AHI may not simply a consequence of increased blood viscosity in patients with OSAS. Moreover, although the PLR and hs-CRP showed significant correlation in our study, the useful inflammatory markers in OSAS were platelet-related inflammatory markers, not hs-CRP. In addition, inflammatory markers are also connected to the development and/or progression of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. To explore the independent role of PLR and PDW on the severity of OSA, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis, which showed that PLR and PDW were independently associated with AHI after adjustment of traditional CVD risk factors and obesity.

Another interesting finding from this study is that OSAS patients with concurrent hypertension had significantly higher PLR values than did those without hypertension. The hypertension that occurs with OSAS may be multifactorial in origin. Systemic inflammation likely plays a major role in the development of hypertension in OSAS. A previous study showed that OSAS patients with hypertension had higher levels of inflammation and insulin resistance than do those without hypertension [30]. Since systemic inflammation plays an important role in hypertension in OSAS, PLR may have a role in the development of hypertension in OSAS patients. We hypothesized that PLR, as a measurable biomarker of systemic inflammation, may be independently associated with hypertension in OSAS patients. Our results suggest that PLR may be useful inflammatory biomarker associated with concurrent hypertension in OSAS, even after adjusting for AHI. This finding suggests that inflammation and subsequent hypertension in OSAS are independent of the severity of upper way obstruction.

This study has several limitations. Since this was a retrospective cohort study, the blood sampling and test parameters were not performed with identical methods. Any variability may have influenced the value of the parameter. In addition, PLR and PDW were based on single measurements. It would be important to determine whether PLR changes over time, and if it is a consistent predictor of OSAS severity. Our study was also conducted with a relatively small sample of patients that was likely insufficient to demonstrate cardiovascular outcomes. In order to achieve more statistical power and substantiate our findings, larger randomized controlled trials are necessary.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study demonstrates evidence of inflammation and platelet activation in OSAS. Therefore, PLR and PDW may be relevant inflammatory markers of OSAS severity. Furthermore, PLR may be a useful inflammatory biomarker associated with concurrent hypertension in OSAS. Further, larger studies using PLR and PDW are needed to assess the effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on OSAS.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

None.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kim-Hae Jung Ang Hospital
(2)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head-Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine
(3)
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head-Neck Surgery, Maryknoll Medical Center
(4)
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Kosin University School of Medicine

References

  1. Hopps E1, Caimi G. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: Links Betwen Pathophysiology and Cardiovascular Complications. Clin Invest Med. 2015;38(6):E362-70.Google Scholar
  2. Shahar E, Whitney CW, Redline S, Lee ET, Newman AB, Nieto FJ, et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and cardiovascular disease: cross-sectional results of the Sleep Heart Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(1):19–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(9):1217–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Faraut B, Boudjeltia KZ, Vanhamme L, Kerkhofs M. Immune, inflammatory and cardiovascular consequences of sleep restriction and recovery. Sleep Med Rev. 2012;16(2):137–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hızlı Ö, Özcan M, Ünal A. Evaluation of comorbidities in patients with OSAS and simple snoring. Scientific World Journal. 2013;2013:709292.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciftci TU, Kokturk O, Bukan N, Bilgihan A. The relationship between serum cytokine levels with obesity and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Cytokine. 2004;28(2):87–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Mehra R, Redline S. Sleep apnea: a proinflammatory disorder that coaggregates with obesity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;121(5):1096–102.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Punjabi NM, Beamer BA. C-reactive protein is associated with sleep disordered breathing independent of adiposity. SLEEP-NEW YORK THEN WESTCHESTER-. 2007;30(1):29.Google Scholar
  9. Tam CS, Wong M, Tam K, Aouad L, Waters KA. The effect of acute intermittent hypercapnic hypoxia treatment on IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP levels in piglets. Sleep. 2007;30(6):723.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Tsiara S, Elisaf M, Jagroop IA, Mikhailidis DP. Platelets as predictors of vascular risk: is there a practical index of platelet activity? Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2003;9(3):177–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Sunbul M, Gerin F, Durmus E, Kivrak T, Sari I, Tigen K, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in patients with dipper versus non-dipper hypertension. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2014;36(4):217–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gary T, Pichler M, Belaj K, Hafner F, Gerger A, Froehlich H, et al. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio: a novel marker for critical limb ischemia in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e67688.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gawaz M, Langer H, May AE. Platelets in inflammation and atherogenesis. J Clin Investig. 2005;115(12):3378.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindemann S, Krämer B, Seizer P, Gawaz M. Platelets, inflammation and atherosclerosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5(s1):203–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Jagroop IA, Clatworthy I, Lewin J, Mikhailidis DP. Shape change in human platelets: measurement with a channelyzer and visualisation by electron microscopy. Platelets. 2000;11(1):28–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Vagdatli E, Gounari E, Lazaridou E, Katsibourlia E, Tsikopoulou F, Labrianou I. Platelet distribution width: a simple, practical and specific marker of activation of coagulation. Hippokratia. 2010;14(1):28.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Medicine AAS, Iber C. The AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events: rules, terminology and technical specifications: American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2007.Google Scholar
  18. Banks S, Dinges DF. Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. Journal of clinical sleep medicine: JCSM: official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2007;3(5):519.Google Scholar
  19. Meerlo P, Sgoifo A, Suchecki D. Restricted and disrupted sleep: effects on autonomic function, neuroendocrine stress systems and stress responsivity. Sleep Med Rev. 2008;12(3):197–210.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mirrakhimov AE. Obstructive sleep apnea and kidney disease: is there any direct link? Sleep Breath. 2012;16(4):1009–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavie L. Oxidative stress inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in obstructive sleep apnea. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012;4:1391–403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhu H, Wang Z, Xue X, Zhang P, Yang C, Su B. [Lower grade chronic inflammation is associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2014;37(6):411–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Unnikrishnan D, Jun J, Polotsky V. Inflammation in sleep apnea: an update. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015;16(1):25–34.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Folsom AR, Wu KK, Rosamond WD, Sharrett AR, Chambless LE. Prospective Study of Hemostatic Factors and Incidence of Coronary Heart Disease The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Circulation. 1997;96(4):1102–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ross R. Atherosclerosis--an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(2):115–26.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Korkmaz M, Korkmaz H, Küçüker F, Ayyıldız SN, Çankaya S. Evaluation of the Association of Sleep Apnea-Related Systemic Inflammation with CRP, ESR, and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2015;21:477.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Medeiros CA, de Bruin VM, Andrade GM, Coutinho WM, de Castro-Silva C, de Bruin PF. Obstructive sleep apnea and biomarkers of inflammation in ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;126(1):17–22.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Seo YJ, Choi JY, Moon IS. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio: novel markers for diagnosis and prognosis in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Dis Markers. 2014;2014.Google Scholar
  29. Balta S, Demirkol S, Kucuk U. The platelet lymphocyte ratio may be useful inflammatory indicator in clinical practice. Hemodial Int. 2013;17(4):668–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Qian X, Yin T, Li T, Kang C, Guo R, Sun B, et al. High levels of inflammation and insulin resistance in obstructive sleep apnea patients with hypertension. Inflammation. 2012;35(4):1507–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Song et al. 2016

Advertisement