Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparisons of sensitivity, specificity, agreement and predictive values of hypercholesterolaemia at increasing diagnostic thresholds

From: Comparing self-reported and measured hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia at standard and more stringent diagnostic thresholds: the cross-sectional 2010–2015 Busselton Healthy Ageing study

Variable

TC ≥5.5 mmol/L, LDL-C ≥3.5 mmol/L and/or lipid-lowering medications

TC ≥6.2 mmol/L, LDL-C ≥4.1 mmol/L and/or lipid-lowering medications

TC ≥6.5 mmol/L, LDL-C ≥4.9 mmol/L and/or lipid-lowering medications

OBJ+

OBJ–

Total

OBJ+

OBJ–

Total

OBJ+

OBJ–

Total

SR+

1,362

122

1,484

1,201

283

1,484

1,073

411

1,484

SR–

2,078

1,314

3,392

986

2,406

3,392

584

2,808

3,392

Total

3,440

1,436

4,876

2,187

2,689

4,876

1,657

3,219

4,876

Prevalence OBJ+ (%)

70.5 (69.3, 71.8)

44.9 (43.5, 46.2)

34.0 (32.7, 35.3)

Prevalence SR+ (%)

30.4 (29.1, 31.7)

30.4 (29.1, 31.7)

30.4 (29.1, 31.7)

Sensitivity (%)

39.6 (38.0, 41.2)

54.9 (52.8, 57.0)

64.8 (62.5, 67.1)

Specificity (%)

91.5 (90.1, 92.9)

89.5 (88.3, 90.6)

87.2 (86.1, 88.4)

PPV (%)

91.8 (90.4, 93.2)

80.9 (78.9, 82.9)

72.3 (70.0, 74.6)

NPV (%)

38.7 (37.1, 40.4)

70.9 (69.4, 72.5)

82.8 (81.5, 84.1)

Kappa (κ)

0.223 (0.205, 0.241)

0.458 (0.435, 0.482)

0.533 (0.508, 0.558)

  1. TC total cholesterol, LDL-C low density lipoprotein cholesterol, OBJ+ positive objective measure, OBJ– negative objective measure, SR+ positive self-reported measure, SR– negative self-reported measure, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value